nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index nglreturns.myfreeforum.org
Nglreturns is a forum to discuss religion, philosophy, ethics etc...

NGLReturns Daily Quiz - Play here!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Betrand Russell - Philosopher or commentator

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> Philosophy Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Lexilogio
Well Known Chatterbox...


Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 7585


Location: North of the Watford Gap

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:56 pm    Post subject: Betrand Russell - Philosopher or commentator  Reply with quote

Bertrand Russell was a very influential thinker in the twentieth century - but could he genuinely be called a philosopher?
_________________
Lexi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
genghiscant
Community Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 844


Location: Hampshire

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 8:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A definite yes.
_________________
People look at the possibilities, choose the one that most appeals to them, and then work backwards to justify the position.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lexilogio
Well Known Chatterbox...


Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 7585


Location: North of the Watford Gap

PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 9:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

genghiscant wrote:
A definite yes.


 You can't just say yes - you have to say why!

Bertrand Russell wrote about philosophy - but did he introduce anything new? Take any concepts forward?
_________________
Lexi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Shaker
Site Admin


Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 8694



PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll bite  

A definite yes, but his most important contributions to philosophy were in founding analytical philosophy (along with Wittgenstein) and in formal logic, such as in the Principia Mathematica which he co-wrote with A.N. Whitehead. These were and are areas which were and are way, way above the comprehension of all but the most scholarly and academic philosophers - only the very few can follow along. It's easy to see why he might be thought of as merely a commentator since even today his popular reputation rests on the huge number of books and articles pitched at a lay audience - philosophical issues couched in clear, non-technical language for the ordinary reader. Because of its sheer volume (much of this is still in print and can be found in any High Street bookshop to this day) it has tended to overshadow his really, really technical work, but yes, he was a real philosopher.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
genghiscant
Community Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 844


Location: Hampshire

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah. What he said.
_________________
People look at the possibilities, choose the one that most appeals to them, and then work backwards to justify the position.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lexilogio
Well Known Chatterbox...


Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 7585


Location: North of the Watford Gap

PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shaker wrote:
I'll bite  

A definite yes, but his most important contributions to philosophy were in founding analytical philosophy (along with Wittgenstein) and in formal logic, such as in the Principia Mathematica which he co-wrote with A.N. Whitehead. These were and are areas which were and are way, way above the comprehension of all but the most scholarly and academic philosophers - only the very few can follow along. It's easy to see why he might be thought of as merely a commentator since even today his popular reputation rests on the huge number of books and articles pitched at a lay audience - philosophical issues couched in clear, non-technical language for the ordinary reader. Because of its sheer volume (much of this is still in print and can be found in any High Street bookshop to this day) it has tended to overshadow his really, really technical work, but yes, he was a real philosopher.


So was he involved in the same linguistical philosophy as Wittengstein? That is quite difficult to follow in places.
_________________
Lexi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ketty
Moderator


Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 7376


Location: Walking the narrow path, singing merrily and living Victoriously

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Aren't we all (amateur) philosophers?  We don't need to know to which 'school' we belong, or any technical jargon associated with all that stuff.  Sorry, again this must be brief due to the need to sit in a wardrobe to post (blimmin' hotel Wifi!).
_________________
<><Although Christians and Mormons use the same words such as grace, faith, God and sin, they mean very different things by them. Beware the poison!><>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
genghiscant
Community Member


Joined: 29 Jun 2011
Posts: 844


Location: Hampshire

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree.


Quote:
phi·los·o·pher
   [fi-los-uh-fer] Show IPA

noun
1.
a person who offers views or theories on profound questions in ethics, metaphysics, logic, and other related fields.

2.
a person who is deeply versed in philosophy.

3.
a person who establishes the central ideas of some movement, cult, etc.

4.
a person who regulates his or her life, actions, judgments, utterances, etc., by the light of philosophy  or reason.

5.
a person who is rationally or sensibly calm, especially under trying circumstances.

_________________
People look at the possibilities, choose the one that most appeals to them, and then work backwards to justify the position.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lexilogio
Well Known Chatterbox...


Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 7585


Location: North of the Watford Gap

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I do agree, a philosopher, generally, is one who considers the big questions. Which makes all of us at least amateur philosophers.

Did Russell make significant contributions to a particular field?
_________________
Lexi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mr Spock
Junior Community Member


Joined: 27 Jan 2014
Posts: 53


Location: Sussex

PostPosted: Tue Jan 28, 2014 10:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Berty Russ did philosophy so was a philosopher. I would not say he was one of the greats but neither am I.  " alt="" border="0" />

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> Philosophy Forum All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum