Archive for nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Nglreturns is a forum to discuss religion, philosophy, ethics etc...

NGLReturns Daily Quiz - Play here!
 



       nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> Atheist chat
Powwow

A Christmas gift idea for you atheists

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feat...ayer_detailpage&v=gMwgcv0eoMY
genghiscant

Re: A Christmas gift idea for you atheists

pow wow wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feat...ayer_detailpage&v=gMwgcv0eoMY


It says: "Not available in your country".
Powwow

That's strange, try this then
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AV4YYciRj4
Sebastian Toe

pow wow wrote:
That's strange, try this then
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AV4YYciRj4


and one for gun owners?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNAUo8V2vX4
Powwow

What does gun ownership have to do with atheism? lol
Shaker

What does your video?
Powwow

It's all atheism big fella. And that actor should get an Oscar.lol
You loved it, if you're smart. lol
It's not my video, it's for the atheists, jaded and judgemental la, la, la.
northernstar

pow wow wrote:
It's all atheism big fella. And that actor should get an Oscar.lol
You loved it, if you're smart. lol
It's not my video, it's for the atheists, jaded and judgemental la, la, la.


My sides are aching...........not. Obviously some Canadian trying to be funny and failing miserably.
Shaker

northernstar wrote:
My sides are aching...........not. Obviously some Canadian trying to be funny and failing miserably.

There are lots of those  
Powwow

Poor grumpy atheists.

http://www.videobash.com/video_show/steve-martin-atheist-song-14743
northernstar

Shaker wrote:
northernstar wrote:
My sides are aching...........not. Obviously some Canadian trying to be funny and failing miserably.

There are lots of those  



Well, they did have Leslie Nielsen and up to a point, William Shatner.
Shaker

True, Wiggy Shatner is always good for a chuckle. Have you heard his ... well, for now I'll use the word 'music' till I come up with a better one?  
northernstar

Yes, I know he murdered Pulp's Common People!
IvyOwl

If there is one thing worse that outsiders simplyfying and misrepresenting Christianity in order to take a swipe at it it's the Christians doing the same to Atheists. Both are silly and pointless and say more about the micky takers than the micky taken.
Powwow

My dear Ivy,
You know that actor to be a Christian not an atheist?
It was a comedy skit Ivy. I suppose you would like to greatly restrict comedy skits to the point of not even being allowed to poke fun at animals. Soon the world would be as grumpy and sad as atheists want.
How have you been?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zc...amp;list=UUu2Aq8xa4ap9VQTAtk9OZKQ
Powwow

Don't be so glum atheists. OK, I get that you can't bring yourselves to laugh at a comedy skit on atheists. Boo hoo, so here we go then.


http://www.cbc.ca/22minutes/video...ps---season-20/canadian-mass.html
IvyOwl

My dearest dear PowWow,

Yes I know it was a comedy skit ... duh but who was most enjoying it? mmmmmm who actually found it funny and why?

I agree it's not aways easy to see exactly who is having the micky taken out of them once comedy turns up! Not always as it seems and all that!

I was waiting for a punchline that didn't turn up on the last film you suggested.  
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
Soon the world would be as grumpy and sad as atheists want.

Got any evid ... oh, wait, no, of course there won't be.
IvyOwl

I meant the last but one ... the one about the shoes not the Pope one.
Powwow

Now Ivy, you don't expect me to believe that you have never has a laugh at a comedian doing an over the top imitation of somebody. Come on now Ivy, your nose be growing there?
IvyOwl

What's all this about Altheist being grumpy an' joyless and stuff? I can only assume that all the atheists you know in RL are miserable old sods. In that case I think it's about time you got your sorry ass over this side of the pond and got a different perspective.
Powwow

Oh, sorry I forgot you Brits wouldn't know about Canadians and their Tim Hortons. My apologies.
http://www.bing.com/videos/search...ns+and+their+tim+hortons+you+tube
IvyOwl

As it happens one of the best laughs I ever had was when a friend who was ace at impressions did one of me! I'll admit it was an embarrassed laugh but all the same ........
Powwow

I don't now any godless over here. I'm sure they are around some where.
Shaker

IvyOwl wrote:
What's all this about Altheist being grumpy an' joyless and stuff? I can only assume that all the atheists you know in RL

- if any -

Quote:
In that case I think it's about time you got your sorry ass over this side of the pond and got a different perspective.

... or just YouTubed any of the multifarious atheist comedians. Plenty to choose from:

Ricky Gervais
Dave Allen
Tim Minchin
George Carlin
Jimmy Carr
Eddie Izzard
Jim Jeffries
Stewart Lee
Dara O'Briain
Linda Smith
Doug Stanhope

... to name but a few.
Powwow

http://atheism.about.com/b/2006/0...on-and-poking-fun-at-religion.htm
Shaker

A good article and the perfectly right and proper poll result.
Powwow

I agree as well. It is a good thing to poke fun at atheists and their atheism.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search...6DD&first=121&FORM=NVPFVR
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
I agree as well. It is a good thing to poke fun at atheists and their atheism.

To nobody's surprise, least of all mine, you seem to have completely failed to read the article to which you linked, let alone have understood it ...
Powwow

What are you saying. Poke fun at Christianity but not atheism? lol
Shaker

No - but the article you linked to was about the right (in fact the obligation I'd say) to poke fun at religion.
Powwow

And I agree that we have a right and an obligation to poke fun at atheism.
Powwow

Does Shaker feel obligated to poke fun at the pagan beliefs? lol
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
Does Shaker feel obligated to poke fun at the pagan beliefs? lol

Shaker has minimal acquaintance with pagan beliefs, enough to know that it covers such a wide spectrum, but as far as Shaker is aware of them there's not a whole lot to poke fun at. Pagans are a minority of a minority. Given the lack of examples of the following, they don't act like dicks with homophobic and misogynist views, they don't think they've the right to dictate what other people can do with their bodies, they don't think they've the right to dictate what other people can watch or read, they don't think they've a say in other people's relationships, they don't have schools, they don't proselytise children, they don't think that theirs is the one and only one true path that everybody else has to follow or else. The very slight acquaintance I've ever had with pagans left me thinking they're an absolutely charming bunch - those I've met were, anyway.

In short, even if there were something to poke fun at (which there may be for all I know) why bother? Punch upwards, is the old motto. Direct the invective where it's needed. Like here, for example. When pagans come out with matching vileness, I'll be first in line to scorn, deride and mock them, too.

Not before then, though.
Powwow

"matching vileness". Oh that's too funny. The Roman and Greeks empires were all rainbows and kittens and of course those Viking were total darlings. Oh Shaker please. The pagan's invented vileness.

This is so funny

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zdyJkKA5L4
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
"matching vileness". Oh that's too funny. The Roman and Greeks empires were all rainbows and kittens and of course those Viking were total darlings. Oh Shaker please.

Oh, silly me, I thought you were referring to pagans now - I should have expected that you'd be some two thousand years behind the rest of us. In your discussion with Ivy Owl on AF&N you seem to be very much hung up on the supposed sexual habits of pagans now - yet here it's the pagans of two millennia ago which you allege you intended to discuss.

In other words, you haven't a Scooby

Quote:
The pagan's

The pagan's what?

Quote:
invented vileness.

Did they?

Where and when and how did they do that?
Powwow

What's that Mennonite of "now" doing that's so vile Shaker? Or is it a case of the Christians of yore but don't you mention the pagans of yore? lol
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
What's that Mennonite of "now" doing that's so vile Shaker? Or is it a case of the Christians of yore but don't you mention the pagans of yore? lol

It's a goodly number of the Christians of right now that are the problem; we don't need to bother about the Christians (or any other brand) of yore to look for craziness and general arseholeishness. As has very recently been demonstrated.
Powwow

And you have no problem with how atheists are running North Korea or the atheists in charge of Cuba that are just now allowing Cubans to use the internet.
Atheists with power are the craziest. This is a fact.
Powwow

Oh and just a heads up. The pagan Hindus have a bad record on their treatment of their Muslim minority in India. But Shaker sees no vileness. lol
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
And you have no problem with how atheists are running North Korea or the atheists in charge of Cuba that are just now allowing Cubans to use the internet.

I find that here in England the alleged atheists running North Korea or alleged atheists running Cuba cause me not the slightest hint of inconvenience. Whatever they are doing in those respective countries, I'm not aware that they're doing so in the name of, because of or inspired by atheism. Unless you have some evid ... oh wait, sorry: I know you don't do evidence.
Quote:
Atheists with power are the craziest. This is a fact.

Ah yes, another one of your unique brand of 'facts.'
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
Oh and just a heads up. The pagan Hindus have a bad record on their treatment of their Muslim minority in India. But Shaker sees no vileness. lol

The presumably resolutely non-pagan Muslims (despite the word having at least one sense meaning non-Christian, so why aren't Muslims pagan as well?), or so I've heard tell, have something of a record of their own.

I'd be more than delighted for the whole wretched crew of them to exterminate each other and lighten the burden of the world's insanity, cruelty, bigotry, oppression and persecution by an enormous percentage. The planet will be cleaner, safer and saner without them.
IvyOwl

Oh deary me PowWow do you actually know what an Atheist is?

Shaker ... where so you get your patience from?
northernstar

Shaker wrote:
pow wow wrote:
Oh and just a heads up. The pagan Hindus have a bad record on their treatment of their Muslim minority in India. But Shaker sees no vileness. lol

The presumably resolutely non-pagan Muslims (despite the word having at least one sense meaning non-Christian, so why aren't Muslims pagan as well?), or so I've heard tell, have something of a record of their own.

I'd be more than delighted for the whole wretched crew of them to exterminate each other and lighten the burden of the world's insanity, cruelty, bigotry, oppression and persecution by an enormous percentage. The planet will be cleaner, safer and saner without them.



Don't forget the peaceful Buddhists.
Powwow

I know exactly what you are Ivy dear. Like crazy Kim and the Castro family, you don't believe in gods. Isn't that an atheist? lol

Shaker, atheism pollutes your entire life as it does crazy Kim's. Atheists in power always shows their true colours. Intolerant, vicious, repressive, murderous etc. And yes, this comes from their belief that God does not exist. It comes from Satan. But hey, I will also say that a person calling themselves a Christian and when in power behaves like the atheists, are doing Satan's work as well.

"We discover that autonomous humans can control the world. It's great being and atheist."   Rocky
"We discover that the world and humans are unspeakably horrible. It's miserable being an atheist."   Rocky

LOL
Shaker

When you're a member of an internet forum it helps first (a) to have some sort of coherent idea or point that you want to discuss and (b) to be possessed of at least a basic level of literacy.

I'm sure in what passes for your mind your last car crash of a post above had some sort of intent or meaning, but its general incoherence and illiteracy do a sterling job of hiding it from view.
Powwow

"I have never been a believer"   Fidel Castro

LOL
Shaker

Ah, a coherent thought at last.

Fidel Castro said: "I have never been a believer."

Not exactly novel - neither have I; neither have millions - but it's a statement of sorts, though hardly a funny one.
trentvoyager

Quote:
I believe today that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator.

- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, Vol. 1 Chapter 2


Golly gee batman - we can all post things to prove what we want.  
Powwow

The unicorn in the box

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yNhiDQ9lvc
Powwow

Mr. trent,
Do you think Adolf loved Jesus? LOL
Back to the bat cave for you Mr.
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
Mr. trent,
Do you think Adolf loved Jesus? LOL

Apart from the numbers involved (because of the mid-20th. century technological developments available to him) he did nothing that others who have made exactly that claim have done.
Powwow

Shaker,
http://i.eatliver.com/2008/3541.jpg
Shaker

See it before.

Many, many, many, many times.

And?
trentvoyager

pow wow wrote:
Mr. trent,
Do you think Adolf loved Jesus? LOL
Back to the bat cave for you Mr.


As usual you miss my point (Quelle Surprise).

It matters not a jot what I think about Hitler and his relationship with God - it is the fact that he believed it.

The human race can justify just about anything if it tries hard enough and rationalize their inhumane actions as being approved of by their particular belief. Your harping on about Fidel, or North Korea just shows the stupidity of your position. ITs not atheists or Christians, or any other religious adherents that act in an unhumane fashion, it is people.

Back to fetching me the post, Alfred.
Powwow

Startrek was just a television show Mr. trent.
trentvoyager

pow wow wrote:
Startrek was just a television show Mr. trent.


? ? ?
Shaker

Posting when pissed is always a bad idea, powsers.
Powwow

http://www.bing.com/videos/search...E00&first=161&FORM=NVPFVR
Powwow

I agree. So I recommend you either give up your booze or stay off the internet Shaker. Maybe you should get out of your chair and jog around the block. Oh wait, that would mean leaving your basement and going out into the sunshine. You could wait until tonight.
Powwow

Thanks for the giggles ladies. Suns coming up and I have things to do. Later
IvyOwl

Powwow,

Quote:
I know exactly what you are Ivy dear. Like crazy Kim and the Castro family, you don't believe in gods. Isn't that an atheist?


Yes an atheist is someone who doesn't believe in gods or godesses. But as regards other beliefs and atttudes the term atheist on it's own says nothing.

So:-

1)  Alligning me to people who you understand are/were atheist and who have done bad things to their fellow human beings is at best just plain daft and at worse extremely offensive.

2) I don't recall ever having on this forum given myself a label as regards my belief /non belief in gods,goddesses or any other types of deities.
Shaker

IvyOwl wrote:
Yes an atheist is someone who doesn't believe in gods or godesses. But as regards other beliefs and atttudes the term atheist on it's own says nothing.

So:-

1)  Alligning me to people who you understand are/were atheist and who have done bad things to their fellow human beings is at best just plain daft and at worse extremely offensive.

Offensive - and daft - in the same way as saying:

1) Ian Huntley is a man (true);
2) Ian Huntley murdered children (true);
3) X (insert male celebrity/public figure of choice) is a man (also true);
4) Therefore X murders children.

Yes, it really is as stupid as that. Even if you don't know its name in philosophical terms*, nobody can be so dull of wits as not to know that this is a monumental fallacy. And like pretty much anything and everything else in the same line, done with no real point or thought and put out here simply in order to provoke a reaction.

* Post hoc, ergo propter hoc
Powwow

Don't get riled Ivy. I'm sure you did tell me when I first joined that you are an atheist and the link was, like them, you do not believe in gods. If now you want us to think maybe you do believe in gods, well, whatever. Is there a reason you want to be evasive about it now? You do seem to like the pagans a lot. lol
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
Don't get riled Ivy. I'm sure you did tell me when I first joined that you are an atheist and the link was, like them, you do not believe in gods. If now you want us to think maybe you do believe in gods, well, whatever. Is there a reason you want to be evasive about it now? You do seem to like the pagans a lot. lol

Anybody's belief or disbelief in gods is entirely their own affair and their own personal business until and unless they choose to make it openly known.
Powwow

I believe she did tell me she was an atheist Shaker. Not that this is any of your business.lol Now she could have found some religion since then.
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
I believe she did tell me she was an atheist Shaker.

Belief is as irrelevant here as it is elsewhere.

Quote:
Now she could have found some religion since then.

Could have done. No more your business any more than it is mine.
Powwow

To Ivy,
If you are not an atheist, then my apologies. You are not like those others in the sense that you don't believe in gods. And I have a feeling that you are not a murdering dictator either.
Powwow

So Shaker I guess we can look forward to you never asking a question around here ever again, since it's not your business. lol
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
To Ivy,
If you are not an atheist, then my apologies. You are not like those others in the sense that you don't believe in gods.

What other sense of atheist apart from 'don't believe in gods' is there?
Powwow

http://www.conservapedia.com/imag...7/73/Ncvjgfu.jpg/84px-Ncvjgfu.jpg
Shaker

Ah. Can't answer the question. No great revelation there.
Powwow

Oh dear, you are already thinking it's your business. But you already read my posts on atheists with power. All stems from atheism which stems from Satan. And that's a FACT! Suppose you will blubber on about needing evidence. Well look at the record of governments run by an atheist. Hateful, intolerant and murderous. Every single one of them.

http://ts3.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.49...;w=116&h=148&c=7&rs=1

A just reward for that atheist
http://ts2.mm.bing.net/th?id=H.48...;w=198&h=148&c=7&rs=1
trentvoyager

Quote:
All stems from atheism which stems from Satan. And that's a FACT!


You are going to supply the evidence for that "FACT" oops forgot the "!"

You are really being silly powwow.

I gave you the name of somebody from the last century who said he was a Christian. You kind of wrote that off by asking did I believe he loved Jesus? Implying he wasn't a Christian.

So by the same rules, sorry, none of the people you say are atheists, are really atheists. I say so.

There solved. LOL
Powwow

So Adolf said he loved Jesus?

More Christmas present ideas for you godless.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics...13-days-of-atheist-Christmas.html
Powwow

"The god of war has gone to the other side."   Adolf Hitler

NO, true Christian would say and believe such a thing.
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
So Adolf said he loved Jesus?

More Christmas present ideas for you godless.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/topics...13-days-of-atheist-Christmas.html

Already got six of those, and very highly recommended they are, too.
northernstar

True Christians?

http://listverse.com/2010/02/23/1...-who-give-christianity-a-bad-name
Shaker

northernstar wrote:
True Christians?

Goodness, well done, Steve, well done  

Powsers apparently has the true Christian™ thing down

Quote:
NO, true Christian would say and believe such a thing.


so presumably he'll be able to say.

My guess is that they won't be. Just a hunch.
northernstar

What, no "no true Christian would do any of these things"? Pow wow must agree!
Powwow

LOL

Angry atheists and their dunces
http://www.speroforum.com/a/JBKLY...are-war-on-Christmas#.UgwDCoFzaM8
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
LOL

Angry atheists and their dunces
http://www.speroforum.com/a/JBKLY...are-war-on-Christmas#.UgwDCoFzaM8

... written by the same brain donor who thinks that "Happy solstice" and "Happiness is the only good. The time to be happy is now. The place to be happy is here. The way to be happy is to make others so" are "hate-filled messages" - so "hate-filled" that they had to be vandalised  

No doubt to the terminally clueless, the statements from one of the Nativity organisers (which was won fair and square by lottery - your god must have a sense of humour, no?):

Quote:
The Nativity Scenes Committee has no objection to displays anyone else puts up under the rules that disagree with ours. That is fine. That is the American way of free speech and fair play. Unlike our opponents, we are not trying to push anyone out of Palisades Park. There is plenty of room for all the displays that ever have been erected at Christmas, including this year.


and from the City Attorney Marsha Moutrie:

Quote:
... everyone has equal rights to use the streets and parks for expressive activities.

are "hate-filled messages" as well  
IvyOwl

pow wow wrote:
Don't get riled Ivy. I'm sure you did tell me when I first joined that you are an atheist and the link was, like them, you do not believe in gods. If now you want us to think maybe you do believe in gods, well, whatever. Is there a reason you want to be evasive about it now? You do seem to like the pagans a lot. lol


Not riled up PowWow. I suppose it's possible that I may have stated I was an atheist when first joining but I can't think why I would have  done. Here in a simplified nutshell is my stance on such matters. (I really should be packing and not chatting on here)

The universe is a mystery ... the more we unravel the more there is to discover. Just when we think we've got it sussed something comes along to necessitate a re-evaluation of what we thought we knew.

Given that, there may or may not be entities that could be described as gods or goddesses with powers greater than us humans. There may even be one with supreme power who called it all into existence. They may or may not even be interested in us humans.

What these entities, if they can be said to exist, are made of I have no idea, they could well be a function of mind, Jung's Architypes or whatever. Maybe it enough people believe they can actually be called into being and have an existence of their own?

That's all in the realms of 'possible', interesting notions to ponder.

Now to consider the 'probable'. That the supreme power should turn out to be the
God that a  Middle Eastern tribe adopted from a pantheon strikes me as being incredibly unlikely. Not impossible I grant you but unlikely.

As for Jesus. Well now I can see that the persona that's been build up around him in the minds of believers is indeed a comforting, inspiring image. But we don't know what he really said/believed now do we?  But if I get into all that just now no packing will be done.

So to sum up I neither believe nor disbelieve in gods or goddesses. I'll even grant that the God who underpins Christianity may exist, so I can't even describe myself as an absolute atheist when it comes to your God.  The reason I find discussing this sort of thing with people who self identify as pagans rewarding is that none of them proclaim absolute knowledge and that their's is the one true way. They don't denigrate others religion by saying that they are worshipping the devil. They don't claim exclusive rights to 'goodness'.
Shaker

IvyOwl wrote:
pow wow wrote:
Don't get riled Ivy. I'm sure you did tell me when I first joined that you are an atheist and the link was, like them, you do not believe in gods. If now you want us to think maybe you do believe in gods, well, whatever. Is there a reason you want to be evasive about it now? You do seem to like the pagans a lot. lol


Not riled up PowWow. I suppose it's possible that I may have stated I was an atheist when first joining but I can't think why I would have  done. Here in a simplified nutshell is my stance on such matters. (I really should be packing and not chatting on here)

The universe is a mystery ... the more we unravel the more there is to discover. Just when we think we've got it sussed something comes along to necessitate a re-evaluation of what we thought we knew.

I'm right there with you so far, IO!

Quote:
Given that, there may or may not be entities that could be described as gods or goddesses with powers greater than us humans. There may even be one with supreme power who called it all into existence. They may or may not even be interested in us humans.

Yep, still there!

Quote:
What these entities, if they can be said to exist, are made of I have no idea, they could well be a function of mind, Jung's Architypes or whatever. Maybe it enough people believe they can actually be called into being and have an existence of their own?

I'm still clinging on with the first sentence, though not with the second!

Quote:
Now to consider the 'probable'. That the supreme power should turn out to be the
God that a  Middle Eastern tribe adopted from a pantheon strikes me as being incredibly unlikely. Not impossible I grant you but unlikely.

Back in full agreement

Quote:
As for Jesus. Well now I can see that the persona that's been build up around him in the minds of believers is indeed a comforting, inspiring image. But we don't know what he really said/believed now do we?  But if I get into all that just now no packing will be done.


Still here

Quote:
So to sum up I neither believe nor disbelieve in gods or goddesses. I'll even grant that the God who underpins Christianity may exist, so I can't even describe myself as an absolute atheist when it comes to your God.  The reason I find discussing this sort of thing with people who self identify as pagans rewarding is that none of them proclaim absolute knowledge and that their's is the one true way. They don't denigrate others religion by saying that they are worshipping the devil. They don't claim exclusive rights to 'goodness'.
 

Well, I still agree with the vast majority of that! I'd add a few riders on top, but that'll do for now  
IvyOwl

Quote:
Well, I still agree with the vast majority of that! I'd add a few riders on top, but that'll do for now  


Well yes I could add a few but really this packing isn't doing itself (even though I've poured a libation to the Domestic Goddess of Packing and said magic words and stuff, nothing doing ) The bit about the calling into being was just me being playful   Just trying to consider from all angles or should that be angels? ... I keep getting angles and angels muddled up!
Powwow

Thanks Ivy. I apologize for believing you are an atheist. I now believe you haven't a clue. And that's fine I guess. You were once a believer so like it or not you're still safe. Just like floo, she once was a believer, bad experiences and now she's an agnostic.
Powwow

Too funny
http://www.daylightatheism.org/images/FFRFLetReasonPrevail.jpg
IvyOwl

Quote:
I now believe you haven't a clue
.

You really should stop indulging in erroneous beliefs PowWow!

Still if it makes you happy and I know you mean well .... carry on.

If you have the need to believe I 'haven't a clue' in order to feel comfortable be my guest.  
northernstar

pow wow wrote:
Too funny
http://www.daylightatheism.org/images/FFRFLetReasonPrevail.jpg


As funny as your imaginary friend.
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
Thanks Ivy. I apologize for believing you are an atheist. I now believe you haven't a clue. And that's fine I guess. You were once a believer so like it or not you're still safe.

From?
Powwow

Like that's your business. lol
Shaker

Ah, no answer to the question.

No surprise, either  
Powwow

I wasn't posting to you mister busybody. Mind your own bees wax. lol
Shaker

Sad.
Powwow

Nasty atheists are out foxed by the living nativity scene.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8CpCWVJi4k
Leonard James

pow wow wrote:
Nasty atheists are out foxed by the living nativity scene.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8CpCWVJi4k


Superstitions die hard!
Powwow

Hello Mr. Leo. Have told that to any pagans lately or just Christians cause we're special?
Leonard James

pow wow wrote:
Hello Mr. Leo. Have told that to any pagans lately or just Christians cause we're special?

Don't know anything about pagans, so I don't poke my nose in.

Christianity is another matter ... I was once one of them. (not a real one, of course! )      
Powwow

Of course you weren't a real one. We all know that. You do pop into the pagan section to brown nose it. Never do you question their beliefs despite no scientific evidence. So, yes, you appear just to be a bitter old man and your bitterness is targeted for those of the Christian faith only. Nice, we are special to you then.

I am convince that even if you were never a pretend Christian, you would still target us and our faith for your bigoted nasty remarks.
Shaker

pow wow wrote:
Of course you weren't a real one. We all know that. You do pop into the pagan section to brown nose it. Never do you question their beliefs despite no scientific evidence. So, yes, you appear just to be a bitter old man and your bitterness is targeted for those of the Christian faith only. Nice, we are special to you then.

I am convince that even if you were never a pretend Christian, you would still target us and our faith for your bigoted nasty remarks.

(a) This isn't The Bear Pit;

(b) Leonard is the perhaps the least bitter individual I know;

(c) The likes of you are calling somebody else bitter? There goes another rib ...

       nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> Atheist chat Page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum