Archive for nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Nglreturns is a forum to discuss religion, philosophy, ethics etc...

NGLReturns Daily Quiz - Play here!
 



       nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> All faiths and none
JamesJah

Has science created any thing new yet?

Has science created any thing new?

Because the creator has said that there is nothing new under the sun, which should be quite a challenge for the unintelligent design people should ir not??
Sebastian Toe

Re: Has science created any thing new yet?

JamesJah wrote:
Has science created any thing new?

Because the creator has said that there is nothing new under the sun, which should be quite a challenge for the unintelligent design people should ir not??
http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/7/...e-form-with-alien-dna-six-letters
Leonard James

Re: Has science created any thing new yet?

JamesJah wrote:
Has science created any thing new?

Because the creator has said that there is nothing new under the sun, which should be quite a challenge for the unintelligent design people should ir not??


I see stupidity still abounds in certain posters.
Jim

Science is not a person, but a discip;line.
Science can no more create than can mathematics, geology, literature or a chesse grater.
Science is a tool with which mankind has re fashioned the world around him, with consequences that sometimes are beneficiall, sometimes not.
This is the work of man, James - not of science.
Are you clear about that?
JamesJah

Re: Has science created any thing new yet?

Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Has science created any thing new?

Because the creator has said that there is nothing new under the sun, which should be quite a challenge for the unintelligent design people should ir not??
http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/7/...e-form-with-alien-dna-six-letters


What is DNA who created that?
JamesJah

Re: Has science created any thing new yet?

Leonard James wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Has science created any thing new?

Because the creator has said that there is nothing new under the sun, which should be quite a challenge for the unintelligent design people should ir not??


I see stupidity still abounds in certain posters.


You certainly have that correct, hence the bland non sequential comments that add nothing to the debate.
JamesJah

Jim wrote:
Science is not a person, but a discip;line.
Science can no more create than can mathematics, geology, literature or a chesse grater.
Science is a tool with which mankind has re fashioned the world around him, with consequences that sometimes are beneficiall, sometimes not.
This is the work of man, James - not of science.
Are you clear about that?


How disciplined if every thing has to be unintelligently designed?
JamesJah

Should scientist be allowed to poison the atmosphere?

New Scientist, American Chem, trails


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4wNG35TYYU

Do we have a problem with some scientist thinking that they are god?

Where did they get their god like status from?
Jim

Which scientists think they are God, James?
Do you have evidence that this is, indeed, their thougt?
Are you a mind reader?
JamesJah

Jim wrote:
Which scientists think they are God, James?
Do you have evidence that this is, indeed, their thougt?
Are you a mind reader?


We have many self appointed individuals going about telling us that God is not real how would they know if they are not usurping that position?

Why do they expect us to believe their nonsense?

All that without reading any thing but your post how's that?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk
Sebastian Toe

Re: Has science created any thing new yet?

JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Has science created any thing new?

Because the creator has said that there is nothing new under the sun, which should be quite a challenge for the unintelligent design people should ir not??
http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/7/...e-form-with-alien-dna-six-letters


What is DNA who created that?
define what something new would be to satisfy your question.
JamesJah

Re: Has science created any thing new yet?

Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Has science created any thing new?

Because the creator has said that there is nothing new under the sun, which should be quite a challenge for the unintelligent design people should ir not??
http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/7/...e-form-with-alien-dna-six-letters


What is DNA who created that?
define what something new would be to satisfy your question.


Something that does not exist in creation.
Leonard James

Re: Has science created any thing new yet?

JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Has science created any thing new?

Because the creator has said that there is nothing new under the sun, which should be quite a challenge for the unintelligent design people should ir not??
http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/7/...e-form-with-alien-dna-six-letters


What is DNA who created that?
define what something new would be to satisfy your question.


Something that does not exist in creation.


Don't be daft! You have been brainwashed to believe that "God" created ALL things, so by this stupid claim nothing can exist unless "God" created it.

Obvious bullshit for anybody with an iota of common sense.
Jim

JamesJah wrote:
Jim wrote:
Which scientists think they are God, James?
Do you have evidence that this is, indeed, their thougt?
Are you a mind reader?


We have many self appointed individuals going about telling us that God is not real how would they know if they are not usurping that position?

Why do they expect us to believe their nonsense?

All that without reading any thing but your post how's that?



-
So, no actual evidence that 'many scientists think they are God', then?
Oh, what a surprise.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk
JamesJah

Jim wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Jim wrote:
Which scientists think they are God, James?
Do you have evidence that this is, indeed, their thougt?
Are you a mind reader?


We have many self appointed individuals going about telling us that God is not real how would they know if they are not usurping that position?

Why do they expect us to believe their nonsense?

All that without reading any thing but your post how's that?



-
So, no actual evidence that 'many scientists think they are God', then?
Oh, what a surprise.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk


You should not really answer if you are unable to useor see the URKL's

Any scientist who objects to a god is putting himself in the place of God and must suffer the consequences, take Richard Dawkins as a prime example.

What has Dawkins got to offer the world? Nothing but we have to put up with him keep on spouting his idiot views on what if there is no god?

Why does he bother if he is going to die soon?
JamesJah

Do the foolish who think there is no creator ever wonder how they make people in their mind, and why they do not take billions of years to evolve?

I do hear that this is going to be the new science should be interesting to see if they come up with proving that they do not exist???
 
Sebastian Toe

Re: Has science created any thing new yet?

JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Has science created any thing new?

Because the creator has said that there is nothing new under the sun, which should be quite a challenge for the unintelligent design people should ir not??
http://www.theverge.com/2014/5/7/...e-form-with-alien-dna-six-letters


What is DNA who created that?
define what something new would be to satisfy your question.


Something that does not exist in creation.

Now we have to know what does not exist in creation James!
You are either being very vague or you are positing a stupid question when you know that no reply would meet your impossible condition.
So it would help if you could perhaps give an example of something however far fetched in your imagination, that would give a positive response to your question.
Sebastian Toe

JamesJah wrote:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk

1st one, unadulterated rubbish, scaring idiots who know nothing about science.

2nd one, it was put there by Satan (remember James, according to you, Satan owns youtube) to scare idiots who know nothing about science.

Now James. Do you believe the contents of those videos?
JamesJah

Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk

1st one, unadulterated rubbish, scaring idiots who know nothing about science.

2nd one, it was put there by Satan (remember James, according to you, Satan owns youtube) to scare idiots who know nothing about science.

Now James. Do you believe the contents of those videos?


I believe the contents of scripture and that is regardless of what you have to say you think my opinion is, OK?


What scripture has to say on this matter I have posted but that is obviously not good enough for the emotionally unstable so here it is again.

Ecclesiastes 1:9, 10
What has been is what will be, And what has been done will be done again; There is nothing new under the sun.  Is there anything of which one may say, “Look at this—it is new”? It already existed from long ago; It already existed before our time.

So why are many scientists trying to outsmart the creator of his intelligent designs?
Jim

JamesJah wrote:
Jim wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Jim wrote:
Which scientists think they are God, James?
Do you have evidence that this is, indeed, their thougt?
Are you a mind reader?


We have many self appointed individuals going about telling us that God is not real how would they know if they are not usurping that position?

Why do they expect us to believe their nonsense?

All that without reading any thing but your post how's that?



-
So, no actual evidence that 'many scientists think they are God', then?
Oh, what a surprise.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk


You should not really answer if you are unable to useor see the URKL's

Any scientist who objects to a god is putting himself in the place of God and must suffer the consequences, take Richard Dawkins as a prime example.

What has Dawkins got to offer the world? Nothing but we have to put up with him keep on spouting his idiot views on what if there is no god?

Why does he bother if he is going to die soon?




-
Whatever Dawkins' views are, I'd suggest that thinking he is God is almost certainly not one of them.
So, do you have any evidence that "some scientists think they are God", James - or is this yet another unsubstantiated statement thrown in as evidence?
JamesJah

Jim wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Jim wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Jim wrote:
Which scientists think they are God, James?
Do you have evidence that this is, indeed, their thougt?
Are you a mind reader?


We have many self appointed individuals going about telling us that God is not real how would they know if they are not usurping that position?

Why do they expect us to believe their nonsense?

All that without reading any thing but your post how's that?



-
So, no actual evidence that 'many scientists think they are God', then?
Oh, what a surprise.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk


You should not really answer if you are unable to useor see the URKL's

Any scientist who objects to a god is putting himself in the place of God and must suffer the consequences, take Richard Dawkins as a prime example.

What has Dawkins got to offer the world? Nothing but we have to put up with him keep on spouting his idiot views on what if there is no god?

Why does he bother if he is going to die soon?




-
Whatever Dawkins' views are, I'd suggest that thinking he is God is almost certainly not one of them.
So, do you have any evidence that "some scientists think they are God", James - or is this yet another unsubstantiated statement thrown in as evidence?


As far as I am concerned his thinking is not what I would want in my brain thank you muchly.

What most people miss is the meaning of the word god it is a title given to people who set themselves up in authority whether on not it is appropriate or not.

And Dawkins definitely sets himself up as an authority in the dream world in which he lives.
Sebastian Toe

JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk

1st one, unadulterated rubbish, scaring idiots who know nothing about science.

2nd one, it was put there by Satan (remember James, according to you, Satan owns youtube) to scare idiots who know nothing about science.

Now James. Do you believe the contents of those videos?


I believe the contents of scripture and that is regardless of what you have to say you think my opinion is, OK?


But why do you post those links though? It's not clear is you think they are correct or not!
JamesJah

Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk

1st one, unadulterated rubbish, scaring idiots who know nothing about science.

2nd one, it was put there by Satan (remember James, according to you, Satan owns youtube) to scare idiots who know nothing about science.

Now James. Do you believe the contents of those videos?


I believe the contents of scripture and that is regardless of what you have to say you think my opinion is, OK?


But why do you post those links though? It's not clear is you think they are correct or not!


I think they add fuel to the subject matter, it helps you to see what other opinions there are on the subject.

Learning to think properly in this world is not easy,  being fed one sided information so that we have to change our minds on later it is no good. Being fed both sides of the matter, then regardless of others opinion we can make up our own mind and be comfortable with the decision knowing exactly where we stand on that matter. OK?
Sebastian Toe

JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk

1st one, unadulterated rubbish, scaring idiots who know nothing about science.

2nd one, it was put there by Satan (remember James, according to you, Satan owns youtube) to scare idiots who know nothing about science.

Now James. Do you believe the contents of those videos?


I believe the contents of scripture and that is regardless of what you have to say you think my opinion is, OK?


But why do you post those links though? It's not clear is you think they are correct or not!


I think they add fuel to the subject matter, it helps you to see what other opinions there are on the subject.

Learning to think properly in this world is not easy,  being fed one sided information so that we have to change our minds on later it is no good. Being fed both sides of the matter, then regardless of others opinion we can make up our own mind and be comfortable with the decision knowing exactly where we stand on that matter. OK?
So, you post them because they disagree with your viewpoint in order to give balance to the discussion? I am just trying to figure out what side of thefefence you are on!
JamesJah

Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk

1st one, unadulterated rubbish, scaring idiots who know nothing about science.

2nd one, it was put there by Satan (remember James, according to you, Satan owns youtube) to scare idiots who know nothing about science.

Now James. Do you believe the contents of those videos?


I believe the contents of scripture and that is regardless of what you have to say you think my opinion is, OK?


But why do you post those links though? It's not clear is you think they are correct or not!


I think they add fuel to the subject matter, it helps you to see what other opinions there are on the subject.

Learning to think properly in this world is not easy,  being fed one sided information so that we have to change our minds on later it is no good. Being fed both sides of the matter, then regardless of others opinion we can make up our own mind and be comfortable with the decision knowing exactly where we stand on that matter. OK?
So, you post them because they disagree with your viewpoint in order to give balance to the discussion? I am just trying to figure out what side of thefefence you are on!


You know about a fence then you must also know the choices you have is that not so?

Now I know which side you are on how come you have no knowledge as to which side I am on?
Sebastian Toe

JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk

1st one, unadulterated rubbish, scaring idiots who know nothing about science.

2nd one, it was put there by Satan (remember James, according to you, Satan owns youtube) to scare idiots who know nothing about science.

Now James. Do you believe the contents of those videos?


I believe the contents of scripture and that is regardless of what you have to say you think my opinion is, OK?


But why do you post those links though? It's not clear is you think they are correct or not!


I think they add fuel to the subject matter, it helps you to see what other opinions there are on the subject.

Learning to think properly in this world is not easy,  being fed one sided information so that we have to change our minds on later it is no good. Being fed both sides of the matter, then regardless of others opinion we can make up our own mind and be comfortable with the decision knowing exactly where we stand on that matter. OK?
So, you post them because they disagree with your viewpoint in order to give balance to the discussion? I am just trying to figure out what side of thefefence you are on!


You know about a fence then you must also know the choices you have is that not so?

Now I know which side you are on how come you have no knowledge as to which side I am on?


..because you post in riddles, questions, double-speak scripture-speak, teflon-speak, in fact anything other than plain, ordinary, every day English.
JamesJah

Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mafjwGKZkoc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9S9gwhS6Yk

1st one, unadulterated rubbish, scaring idiots who know nothing about science.

2nd one, it was put there by Satan (remember James, according to you, Satan owns youtube) to scare idiots who know nothing about science.

Now James. Do you believe the contents of those videos?


I believe the contents of scripture and that is regardless of what you have to say you think my opinion is, OK?


But why do you post those links though? It's not clear is you think they are correct or not!


I think they add fuel to the subject matter, it helps you to see what other opinions there are on the subject.

Learning to think properly in this world is not easy,  being fed one sided information so that we have to change our minds on later it is no good. Being fed both sides of the matter, then regardless of others opinion we can make up our own mind and be comfortable with the decision knowing exactly where we stand on that matter. OK?
So, you post them because they disagree with your viewpoint in order to give balance to the discussion? I am just trying to figure out what side of thefefence you are on!


You know about a fence then you must also know the choices you have is that not so?

Now I know which side you are on how come you have no knowledge as to which side I am on?


..because you post in riddles, questions, double-speak scripture-speak, teflon-speak, in fact anything other than plain, ordinary, every day English.


Like what you does?
Sebastian Toe

JamesJah wrote:


Like what you does?


Well done James, that short statement is by far the most intelligible thing you have written, for years.
No double speak, no vague references to scripture, no mention of impending doom.
A wee it wonky grammar but we can forgive you that.
Now all you have to do is keep that up and maybe you can have reasonable discussions with people?

Don't go spoiling it now!
JamesJah

Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:


Like what you does?


Well done James, that short statement is by far the most intelligible thing you have written, for years.
No double speak, no vague references to scripture, no mention of impending doom.
A wee it wonky grammar but we can forgive you that.
Now all you have to do is keep that up and maybe you can have reasonable discussions with people?

Don't go spoiling it now!



So are we able now to find out why scientist keep trying to prove that unintelligent design is ok for science but intelligent design is no good For the creator of all things?

Why is being stupid the smart way of life on this planet?

There is a rumour going round that the Americans now have the capacity to wipe mankind off the face of the planet with their unintelligent designs, is that true who would know?
JamesJah

I thought not.


Intelligentsia does not come into the equation of evolution now does it?
Sebastian Toe

JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:


Like what you does?


Well done James, that short statement is by far the most intelligible thing you have written, for years.
No double speak, no vague references to scripture, no mention of impending doom.
A wee it wonky grammar but we can forgive you that.
Now all you have to do is keep that up and maybe you can have reasonable discussions with people?

Don't go spoiling it now!



So are we able now to find out why scientist keep trying to prove that unintelligent design is ok for science ?

You will need to give examples of this before any comment can be made, otherwise it is one of your broad sweeping  and generally meaningless statements which can basically be ignored.
JamesJah

Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:


Like what you does?


Well done James, that short statement is by far the most intelligible thing you have written, for years.
No double speak, no vague references to scripture, no mention of impending doom.
A wee it wonky grammar but we can forgive you that.
Now all you have to do is keep that up and maybe you can have reasonable discussions with people?

Don't go spoiling it now!



So are we able now to find out why scientist keep trying to prove that unintelligent design is ok for science ?

You will need to give examples of this before any comment can be made, otherwise it is one of your broad sweeping  and generally meaningless statements which can basically be ignored.


They the scientist that is in America managed to get intelligent design over ruled on December 20 2005 so it must be true does it not?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI
Sebastian Toe

JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:


Like what you does?


Well done James, that short statement is by far the most intelligible thing you have written, for years.
No double speak, no vague references to scripture, no mention of impending doom.
A wee it wonky grammar but we can forgive you that.
Now all you have to do is keep that up and maybe you can have reasonable discussions with people?

Don't go spoiling it now!



So are we able now to find out why scientist keep trying to prove that unintelligent design is ok for science ?

You will need to give examples of this before any comment can be made, otherwise it is one of your broad sweeping  and generally meaningless statements which can basically be ignored.


They the scientist that is in America managed to get intelligent design over ruled on December 20 2005 so it must be true does it not?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI


It was overruled by a court, using evidence.
JamesJah

Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:
Sebastian Toe wrote:
JamesJah wrote:


Like what you does?


Well done James, that short statement is by far the most intelligible thing you have written, for years.
No double speak, no vague references to scripture, no mention of impending doom.
A wee it wonky grammar but we can forgive you that.
Now all you have to do is keep that up and maybe you can have reasonable discussions with people?

Don't go spoiling it now!



So are we able now to find out why scientist keep trying to prove that unintelligent design is ok for science ?

You will need to give examples of this before any comment can be made, otherwise it is one of your broad sweeping  and generally meaningless statements which can basically be ignored.


They the scientist that is in America managed to get intelligent design over ruled on December 20 2005 so it must be true does it not?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2xyrel-2vI


It was overruled by a court, using evidence.


Which court when and what evidence?

Do evolutionist have proof of their theories yet?0 No but they still think insulting people is the way to win their unproved evidence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH0vQiudp6I

If we had intelligent people would we need to call some scientists?

       nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> All faiths and none
Page 1 of 1
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum