nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index nglreturns.myfreeforum.org
Nglreturns is a forum to discuss religion, philosophy, ethics etc...

NGLReturns Daily Quiz - Play here!
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   Join! (free) Join! (free)
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 


Churches oppose three-person baby plan.
Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> Christian chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
gone
Well Known Chatterbox...


Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 6411


Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:46 am    Post subject:  Reply with quote

Paul wrote:
Floo wrote:
Paul wrote:
The Boyg wrote:
It isn't anything to do with designer babies.


It's so that gay couples can have their baby and both be the father. Personally I think a chihuahua would suit such couples much better.


As there is nothing wrong with gay couple having kids, if it works for them fine.


Except that it's unnatural, the child (which they "simply must have", said in the campest voice possble) being a mere commodity they can aquire by some Frankenstein process.


What is unnatural about it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul
Senior Community Member


Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 1509


Location: Ad orientem

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 9:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Floo wrote:
Paul wrote:
Floo wrote:
Paul wrote:
The Boyg wrote:
It isn't anything to do with designer babies.


It's so that gay couples can have their baby and both be the father. Personally I think a chihuahua would suit such couples much better.


As there is nothing wrong with gay couple having kids, if it works for them fine.


Except that it's unnatural, the child (which they "simply must have", said in the campest voice possble) being a mere commodity they can aquire by some Frankenstein process.


What is unnatural about it?


Work it out. Or if you need help, the mechanics don't quite work. It goes with the territory, I would have thought.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gone
Well Known Chatterbox...


Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 6411


Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul wrote:
Floo wrote:
Paul wrote:
Floo wrote:
Paul wrote:
The Boyg wrote:
It isn't anything to do with designer babies.


It's so that gay couples can have their baby and both be the father. Personally I think a chihuahua would suit such couples much better.


As there is nothing wrong with gay couple having kids, if it works for them fine.


Except that it's unnatural, the child (which they "simply must have", said in the campest voice possble) being a mere commodity they can aquire by some Frankenstein process.


What is unnatural about it?


Work it out. Or if you need help, the mechanics don't quite work. It goes with the territory, I would have thought.


As long as they are good parents that is all that matters!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Paul
Senior Community Member


Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 1509


Location: Ad orientem

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I said, give them a chihauhau instead.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
gone
Well Known Chatterbox...


Joined: 25 Aug 2008
Posts: 6411


Location: UK

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 12:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul wrote:
As I said, give them a chihauhau instead.


Don't be silly.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cyberman
Senior Community Member


Joined: 23 Mar 2011
Posts: 3750


Location: Edinburgh

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul wrote:
Floo wrote:
Paul wrote:
Floo wrote:
Paul wrote:
The Boyg wrote:
It isn't anything to do with designer babies.


It's so that gay couples can have their baby and both be the father. Personally I think a chihuahua would suit such couples much better.


As there is nothing wrong with gay couple having kids, if it works for them fine.


Except that it's unnatural, the child (which they "simply must have", said in the campest voice possble) being a mere commodity they can aquire by some Frankenstein process.


What is unnatural about it?


Work it out. Or if you need help, the mechanics don't quite work. It goes with the territory, I would have thought.


Paul - as Jim and I have explained, this has sod all to do with same sex couples.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Boyg
Senior Community Member


Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 3527



PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Paul wrote:
The Boyg wrote:
It isn't anything to do with designer babies.


It's so that gay couples can have their baby and both be the father. Personally I think a chihuahua would suit such couples much better.


This procedure has nothing to do with gay couples.

It has nothing to do with designer babies (I'm still waiting for Floo to explain how she thinks that it does).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
The Boyg
Senior Community Member


Joined: 24 Aug 2011
Posts: 3527



PostPosted: Tue Feb 17, 2015 9:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Floo wrote:
Oh forget it Boygie, in your pedantic way, whatever I say you will go over and over it again.


If you're incapable of explaining what you think the link is between this procedure and designer babies you simply had to say so at the start and that would have been the end of it.

No need for you to be so evasive about the fact that you have made a statement that you can't justify.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
cymrudynnion
Senior Community Member


Joined: 13 Jun 2011
Posts: 1208



PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Boyg wrote:
Paul wrote:
The Boyg wrote:
It isn't anything to do with designer babies.


It's so that gay couples can have their baby and both be the father. Personally I think a chihuahua would suit such couples much better.


This procedure has nothing to do with gay couples.

It has nothing to do with designer babies (I'm still waiting for Floo to explain how she thinks that it does).
You sure it has nothing to do with gay couples?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jim
Senior Community Member


Joined: 15 Jun 2011
Posts: 4842


Location: South West Scotland

PostPosted: Tue Mar 10, 2015 11:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="cymrudynnion:124480"]
The Boyg wrote:
Paul wrote:
The Boyg wrote:
It isn't anything to do with designer babies.


It's so that gay couples can have their baby and both be the father. Personally I think a chihuahua would suit such couples much better.


This procedure has nothing to do with gay couples.

It has nothing to do with designer babies (I'm still waiting for Floo to explain how she thinks that it does).
You sure it has nothing to do with gay couples?






Dunno about the Boyg, but  I'm sure the gay thing isn't an issue in this instance.


_________________
Christians accept One God, Triune in nature.
SAOR ALBA GU BRATH!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    nglreturns.myfreeforum.org Forum Index -> Christian chat All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 3 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Create your own free forum | Buy a domain to use with your forum